Cannabis Legalization Linked to Reduced Opioid Use, McGill Study Finds
New research from McGill University shows adult-use cannabis laws correlate with declines in prescription opioid dispensing and overdose deaths.

Researchers in PPE examining samples with a microscope in a laboratory setting.
Opioid Prescription Rates Declined in Legal States
States that legalized adult-use cannabis saw prescription opioid dispensing rates drop by an average of 6.9 percent within two years of implementation, according to the McGill analysis. Researchers at McGill's Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences examined Medicaid and Medicare Part D prescription data from 2010 through 2024 across all 50 states. States with operational retail markets showed the steepest declines. Medical-only programs produced smaller but still measurable reductions.
The research controlled for pre-existing trends in opioid prescribing, state-level demographic variables, and concurrent policy changes including prescription drug monitoring programs. Lead author Dr. Émilie Fortier noted the effect was most pronounced for chronic pain patients under age 65.
Overdose Deaths Also Fell Post-Legalization
Opioid-involved overdose deaths declined by 4.2 percent on average in states with adult-use legalization, the study found. Prescription opioids and heroin drove the reduction, while fentanyl-involved deaths showed no statistically significant change. McGill's team used CDC WONDER mortality data and state-level toxicology reports to isolate cannabis policy effects from broader trends in the overdose crisis.
Earlier research from RAND Corporation and the University of Kentucky documented similar substitution patterns. For full background on this story, see the CannIntel topic hub on cannabis legalization health impacts.
Implications for Federal Rescheduling Debate
The McGill study arrives as DEA weighs a proposed rule to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812. Published as NPRM docket DEA-407 in May 2024, the rescheduling proposal triggered more than 43,000 public comments. Many cited harm-reduction potential as justification for loosening federal restrictions.
Critics of the current Schedule I classification argue the McGill findings undercut DEA's longstanding position that cannabis has no accepted medical use. When will the agency finalize the rescheduling rule? It hasn't said.
Sources
The cannabis newsletter you forward to your team.
Federal policy, market data, grower alerts, and the one story that matters today. Sent every weekday at 7am. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe with one click. 21+ only.
Related from Medical

New Review Challenges Evidence Behind Cannabis 'Entourage Effect'
A systematic review questions the scientific foundation of the widely marketed claim that minor cannabinoids enhance THC effects.

One in Five U.S. Adults Over 50 Used Cannabis in Past Year, Study Finds
New research documents the highest-ever prevalence of cannabis use among older Americans, with consumption rates tripling since 2013.

Cannabis Smoke and Lung Cancer Link Remains Unresolved in New Review
American Council on Science and Health analysis finds conflicting epidemiological data despite biological plausibility.
More from the newsroom

Missouri sets 0.4mg THC threshold, pulls hemp products into adult-use market Nov. 12
Anything above 0.4 milligrams of THC per container becomes marijuana, sellable only through licensed dispensaries.

Netherlands Cannabis Policies Show Structural Gaps Despite Coffeeshop Model
Policy analysts highlight enforcement inconsistencies and supply-chain ambiguities in Dutch cannabis framework.

Vermont Lieutenant Governor Accused of Violating State Cannabis Laws
State official faces allegations of breaking Vermont's cannabis regulations, raising questions about enforcement and political accountability.