● BreakingLaws · ballot-measures

Anti-cannabis group outspends Massachusetts industry 4-to-1 in ballot fight

National prohibitionist campaign has raised over $8 million to recriminalize the state's $1.65 billion cannabis market ahead of November vote.

By Ethan Walsh, Investigations EditorPublished September 9, 20264 min read
Voting booth setup with American flag, symbolizing election day.

Voting booth setup with American flag, symbolizing election day.

A national anti-marijuana organization is outspending the Massachusetts cannabis industry by more than four-to-one in the campaign to recriminalize adult-use sales, with the prohibitionist side reporting over $8 million in contributions against the industry's $1.9 million as of the September 6 filing deadline, according to state campaign finance records reviewed by CannIntel.

Funding gap widens in final stretch before November ballot

The prohibitionist campaign committee, Citizens for a Safer Massachusetts, reported $8.3 million in total receipts through early September, compared to $1.9 million raised by the industry-backed Coalition to Protect Massachusetts Communities. The 4.4-to-1 spending advantage marks the widest financial gap in any state cannabis ballot measure since Arizona's 2020 legalization vote, when opponents outspent proponents 3-to-1 but still lost by 20 points.

Citizens for a Safer Massachusetts is the state affiliate of Smart Approaches to Marijuana, the Washington-based advocacy group founded by former Representative Patrick Kennedy. SAM has funneled $6.2 million directly into the Massachusetts committee since June, according to filings with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance. The remaining $2.1 million? That came from in-state donors, predominantly faith-based organizations and law enforcement unions.

Industry coalition struggles to match out-of-state funding

The Coalition to Protect Massachusetts Communities has raised just $1.9 million, with 71 percent coming from the state's four largest multi-state operators. Curaleaf contributed $580,000. Verano Holdings put in $440,000, Trulieve $310,000, and Cresco Labs $220,000. No single-state operator contributed more than $50,000.

Through September 6, the coalition spent $1.4 million, primarily on digital advertising and direct mail in suburban swing districts where polling shows the recriminalization measure running within the margin of error. Citizens for a Safer Massachusetts spent $6.8 million over the same period, concentrating its budget on broadcast television in the Boston and Springfield media markets.

Ballot measure would shutter 240 dispensaries, reinstate felony penalties

The initiative, formally designated Question 4 on the November ballot, would repeal the 2016 adult-use legalization statute and reinstate criminal penalties for possession over one ounce and all sales activity. Massachusetts currently licenses 240 retail dispensaries and 138 cultivation facilities, collectively employing 14,200 workers and generating $1.65 billion in annual sales, according to the Cannabis Control Commission's August report.

If approved, the measure would require all retail licenses to be surrendered by January 31, 2027. Possession of more than one ounce would revert to a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail. Sales of any quantity would become a felony carrying a maximum five-year sentence, matching the pre-2016 statute.

Polling shows narrow margins in key suburban districts

A UMass Amherst poll conducted August 18-24 found the recriminalization measure trailing 48 percent to 44 percent statewide, with 8 percent undecided. The survey of 1,200 likely voters carried a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. Support for recriminalization polled highest in Plymouth County at 51 percent and lowest in Suffolk County at 38 percent.

Where's the money going? The prohibitionist campaign has concentrated its television spending in the Interstate 495 corridor, where swing voters in Middlesex and Worcester counties will likely determine the outcome. Citizens for a Safer Massachusetts aired $3.2 million in broadcast spots between July 15 and September 6, compared to $890,000 spent by the industry coalition over the same window, according to Federal Communications Commission public inspection files.

SAM replicates funding model from failed Florida, Ohio campaigns

Smart Approaches to Marijuana used the same out-of-state funding strategy in Florida's 2024 adult-use ballot fight, where it spent $11 million but lost 58 percent to 42 percent. The group also spent $9 million opposing Ohio's 2023 legalization measure, which passed 57 percent to 43 percent despite the funding disadvantage faced by proponents.

SAM's Massachusetts affiliate hasn't disclosed individual donors beyond the $6.2 million SAM national transfer. Under Massachusetts campaign finance law, 501(c)(4) organizations aren't required to itemize contributors below $200. The industry coalition, by contrast, files as a traditional ballot question committee and must disclose all donors above $50.

Economic impact study projects $2.1 billion in lost output if measure passes

A September economic analysis commissioned by the Coalition to Protect Massachusetts Communities estimated that recriminalization would eliminate $2.1 billion in annual economic output and $340 million in state and local tax revenue. The study, conducted by the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University, modeled job losses at 18,400 direct and indirect positions if all licensed cannabis businesses closed by the statutory deadline.

Beyond jobs and tax revenue, the analysis also projected a $480 million one-time cost to municipalities in the form of foregone local-option excise taxes already budgeted for fiscal year 2027. Thirty-two cities and towns levy the optional 3 percent local cannabis tax on top of the state's 10.75 percent combined excise and sales tax.

Final campaign finance reports due October 25

Both campaigns must file updated contribution and expenditure reports by October 25, covering the period through October 18. That filing will capture the final three weeks of television advertising and direct voter contact before the November 5 election. For full background on this ballot fight, see the CannIntel topic hub on the Massachusetts recriminalization initiative.

The spending gap may narrow if national cannabis industry groups increase contributions in October, but no major out-of-state cannabis PAC has yet disclosed Massachusetts expenditures in Federal Election Commission filings. Early voting begins October 21.

Full context

For complete background, history, and our ongoing coverage of this story:

Open the CannIntel topic hub →

Sources

Massachusettsballot measuresrecriminalizationSmart Approaches to Marijuanacampaign financeQuestion 4
The CannIntel Daily

The cannabis newsletter you forward to your team.

Federal policy, market data, grower alerts, and the one story that matters today. Sent every weekday at 7am. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe with one click. 21+ only.

Related from Laws

More from the newsroom