Trump Administration Urges Congress to Preserve CBD Access
White House signals support for maintaining hemp-derived CBD exemptions amid regulatory uncertainty.

High-quality CBD products in bottles and boxes on a neutral background, ideal for wellness concepts.
Administration Position on Hemp-Derived CBD
The White House is lobbying Capitol Hill to maintain the current statutory exemption for CBD extracted from lawfully cultivated hemp. Officials are reaching out after months of regulatory ambiguity surrounding hemp-derived cannabinoids. The Food and Drug Administration continues to delay finalizing rules for CBD in food and dietary supplements.
According to the greenstate.com report, administration officials have engaged with members of the House and Senate agriculture committees. The conversations focus on preserving language in the 2018 Farm Bill that distinguishes hemp from marijuana based on THC concentration thresholds.
Regulatory Timeline and FDA Inaction
FDA hasn't issued final guidance on CBD products despite a statutory mandate to do so within two years of the 2018 Farm Bill's enactment. That deadline passed in December 2020. The agency published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in 2023 but hasn't moved forward with formal regulations.
State-level CBD regulations vary widely. Some states have adopted permissive frameworks. Others impose strict labeling and testing requirements. Industry stakeholders estimate the U.S. CBD market at $5 billion annually, though exact figures remain uncertain due to inconsistent reporting standards — a fragmented landscape that the delay has only worsened.
Congressional Context and Farm Bill Reauthorization
The 2023 Farm Bill reauthorization is pending in Congress, with hemp provisions a focal point of negotiations. House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson has indicated support for maintaining hemp's legal status but has also called for tighter oversight of intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoids such as delta-8 THC.
Senate Agriculture Committee ranking member John Boozman has proposed amendments that would grant FDA explicit authority to regulate CBD as a food ingredient. Hemp trade groups oppose that proposal. They argue it would effectively re-schedule CBD by subjecting it to the same approval pathway as pharmaceutical drugs.
Industry Reaction and Market Implications
Hemp industry organizations have welcomed the administration's position but remain cautious about enforcement gaps. The U.S. Hemp Roundtable and the Hemp Industries Association both issued statements praising the White House's engagement with Congress. Both groups emphasized that statutory protection alone isn't sufficient without clear FDA rules.
Market analysts note that the administration's stance may stabilize investor confidence in the CBD sector. Publicly traded hemp companies saw share-price gains on June 9 following the greenstate.com report, though trading volumes remained modest.
Enforcement Priorities and DEA Coordination
The Drug Enforcement Administration hasn't issued new guidance on hemp-derived CBD since the 2018 Farm Bill took effect. DEA's Diversion Control Division continues to treat hemp extracts as exempt from scheduling provided they meet the statutory THC threshold. State-level law enforcement agencies have inconsistently applied that standard, particularly in states without explicit hemp programs.
The administration's congressional outreach may signal an effort to preempt DEA rulemaking that could narrow the hemp exemption. DEA has authority under the Controlled Substances Act to schedule substances by analogue or by chemical structure — a power that could theoretically extend to cannabinoids regardless of their botanical source.
Next Steps and Legislative Outlook
Congress is expected to take up Farm Bill reauthorization in the third quarter of 2026, with hemp provisions likely to be debated on the floor. The administration's position gives political cover to lawmakers who support maintaining CBD access but face pressure from constituencies concerned about intoxicating hemp products.
For full background on this story, see the CannIntel topic hub on CBD legal status. The hub tracks federal and state regulatory developments affecting hemp-derived cannabinoids.
The key variable is whether FDA moves forward with rulemaking before Congress acts. If the agency finalizes CBD regulations that conflict with the 2018 Farm Bill framework, lawmakers will face a choice: defer to FDA expertise or override the agency through statute. The administration's intervention suggests a preference for the latter.
For complete background, history, and our ongoing coverage of this story:
Open the CannIntel topic hub →Frequently asked questions
What is the current legal status of CBD derived from hemp?
Hemp-derived CBD is federally legal under the 2018 Farm Bill if extracted from hemp containing less than 0.3% THC. However, FDA has not finalized regulations permitting CBD in food or dietary supplements, creating regulatory ambiguity for manufacturers and retailers.
Why is the Trump administration involved in CBD policy?
The administration is lobbying Congress to maintain statutory protections for hemp-derived CBD as part of the pending Farm Bill reauthorization. The move aims to prevent regulatory rollbacks that could restrict access to CBD products.
What happens if Congress does not act on hemp provisions?
Without congressional action, FDA and DEA retain authority to regulate or schedule hemp-derived cannabinoids through administrative rulemaking. Industry stakeholders fear this could result in stricter controls or a de facto ban on CBD in consumer products.
How does this affect state-level CBD regulations?
Federal statutory protection does not preempt state law. States can impose stricter requirements on CBD products, including testing, labeling, and licensing mandates. The administration's position does not change state-level enforcement discretion.
Sources
The cannabis newsletter you forward to your team.
Federal policy, market data, grower alerts, and the one story that matters today. Sent every weekday at 7am. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe with one click. 21+ only.
Related from Laws

NORML Calls Federal Rescheduling Inadequate, Demands Descheduling
The advocacy group says moving cannabis to Schedule III preserves federal prohibition and fails to address core legal conflicts.

Federal Workers' Comp Bill Advances, Blocks Medical Marijuana Coverage
House committee moves legislation explicitly barring federal employees from receiving reimbursement for state-legal cannabis treatment under workers' compensation.

Michigan Cannabis Group Challenges Restrictive Marijuana Laws
Advocacy coalition files legal challenge to state regulations limiting home cultivation and retail access.
More from the newsroom

Virginia Governor Reports Productive Cannabis Legalization Talks With Lawmakers
Governor describes recent legislative conversations as productive, signaling renewed momentum for adult-use cannabis in Virginia.

Ohio Medical Cannabis Dispensary Licenses Face New Delays
State regulators postpone license awards as application review drags into second quarter.

40 Brazilian Patient Groups Win Habeas Corpus for Cannabis Cultivation
Court rulings grant legal protection to medical cannabis patient associations cultivating for members under Brazil's evolving regulatory framework.